Adebayo Okeowo: Thou Shall Not Wear A Mini Skirt
I
had been informed of Swaziland’s intolerance for women in short skirts
or revealing clothes but to witness it firsthand hand was a totally
different experience. Now what I saw was not a skimpily clad daughter of
Adam but a grandmother who berated two young girls for wearing short
skirts and revealing tops. Considering the case of a girl who was
publicly stripped at a taxi rank in Manzini (one of Swaziland’s cities)
for wearing a mini skirt and her thighs scrubbed with a brush, mini
skirts are probably the next greatest act of treason in Swaziland,
second only to the crime of insulting the king.
For a country like Swaziland which holds
the honour of being the world’s last standing absolute monarchy, the
situation is especially ironic because every August in the same Kingdom,
thousands of young girls participate in the highly celebrated reed
dance during which they appear topless and wear tiny things which reveal
more skin than the condemned mini-skirts. It is therefore hypocritical
for Swazis to insist that women should not wear mini-skirts on the
grounds that it is revealing. This reservation is widespread to the
point that the Police in 2012 blocked women dressed in mini-skirts from
demonstrating against rape. More worrisome is the notion in some
quarters that wearing skimpy clothes justifies rape. So while the
government should be arresting perpetrators of sex crimes, it is instead
placing the onus of rape prevention on the women who wear supposedly
skimpy clothes.
When I conversed with some men in
Swaziland about their intolerance for the mini skirt vis-à-vis the reed
dance dressing, their response was that ‘the reed dance is our culture’.
That reasoning is flawed because if the said men can allege that the
reed dance is their culture and no sexual connotation flows from the
nudity, then it can be argued that they after all can exercise self
control and restraint if they wanted to in cases of the mini skirt. I
know a lot of Swazis are proud of the reed dance culture – women
inclusive and I am not all about abandoning that cultural practice (even
though I have reservations about it). My premise here is more about the
double standards. Why tell a woman that she cannot wear her mini skirt
because you will as a result have urges but find nothing wrong with
topless women? How would men respond if women told them not to wear
shorts or fitted shirts because it also gives them urges?
Truth is, long skirts and full garbs don’t reduce the rape statistics, reasonable, self controlled and disciplined people do!
This problem does not exist only in
Swaziland. From Brazil to India and even Uganda, women are fighting the
battle of control over the right to choose what to wear. In 2012,
India’s Director General of Police had said that women who dress in
‘flimsy and fashionable’ clothing are inviting men to harass them.
Meanwhile in Uganda, the country’s 2014 anti-pornography law has the
effect of banning women from wearing mini-skirts. The fact that women’s
dressing has become the subject of legislation while men are not, serves
to accentuate the inequality which the world has fought hard against
for too long. and has tried to get rid of through conventions such as
the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against
Women (CEDAW).
Meanwhile, not only has Swaziland
accented to CEDAW, but Section 20 of its 2005 constitution also upholds
the principle of non-discrimination and equality. It therefore becomes
unconstitutional for agents of the state or even individuals to
continually subject women to discriminatory practices based on what they
wear. States are not allowed to pick and choose which rights to promote
or protect, neither can culture be invoked as an excuse to contravene
human rights. It is for this reason that the CEDAW and the African
Women’s Protocol particularly have provisions which call for customary
practices that violate human rights to be transformed in order to remove
their discriminatory element.
But if these will not work maybe it is
time to introduce a rather rash provision across all international
treaties, which I shall propose to read as follows:
‘Any man that uses a woman’s
dressing as justification for rape shall be guilty of a double measure
of the sentence prescribed for the crime of rape’
If you consider that proposition
ridiculous, that is exactly how preposterous it sounds when a man claims
to have raped a woman because she wore a mini-skirt.
No comments:
Post a Comment